On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:02:34PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote : > > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:36:28AM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote : > >> > >>Twas brillig at 22:30:44 03.09.2009 UTC+02 when [email protected] did > >>gyre and gimble: > >> > >> VT> Looks good to me. I've looked at others .og files (in fontconfig > >> VT> for example), and I have seen a Libs.private. SHould it be used ? > >> > >>Yes, of course! > >> > >>The rule of thumb is "when something is not needed to link with a shared > >>library, it goes to {Requires,Libs}.private" > > > >As far as the EFL are concerned Requires.private can replace Requires > >virtually > >everywhere, however this is not true /at all/ for Libs. > > > >In fact, most of what's in Libs currently shouldn't move to Libs.private, > >because they actually are justified. > > are you sure ? > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/pkg-config-guide.html > > shouln't -liconv be in Libs.private ?
[23:35 ~/e17/svn/trunk:svn|r42212]% find -name \*.pc.in | xargs grep iconv zsh: done find -name \*.pc.in | zsh: exit 123 xargs grep iconv I've never stated that Libs and Libs.private were all correctly set. I said that *most* of what is currently in Libs shouldn't move to Libs.private, and that's correct. Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
