On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote : > > Is the following appropriate? > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball > > > > autogen.sh is used by the debian packaging so it seems > > appropriate to include it in the dist tarball > > Either you're packaging from SVN and therefore don't need it to be part of the > dist tarball, or you're packaging from the snapshots at > download.enlightenment.org (or snapshots you generated) and then your > packaging > should be fixed to use directly ./configure instead of configure.sh. > Is there an actual use case I'm missing, for which this change would be > required?
Thanks for filling me in on the expected usage. I was thinking of the case where you want to test what is in SVN by: 1) creating a tarball 2) building a debian package from that tarball after unpacking is and manually copying over the debian/ directory from SVN. But if thats not valid, I'll stop doing it. When you say fixed to use ./configure directly, when and how does that occur? I agree that calling ./configure is preferable when building Debian packages. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
