Am 03.10.2009 15:15, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman):
>
> he doesn't need a solution. beyond having simply written bad install scripts 
> of
> his own which makes it his own bug/problem. :)
i need a solution. if i change my arch ( i can do this with one 
variable) i must adapt the installation path in my scripts. this is not 
a big problem for me, but if i dont know this i have problems.
when i am using svn versions and i update to a more recent version or i 
update a released version then i have no control if the version in the 
directoryname has changed.
>   i don't see a good reason to not
> use the make install. it's used in packaging for multiple distros - it can
> install anywhere you like.. using DESTDIR is a standard way to do this. i 
> don't
> see a very good reason to do your own manual install scripts. :)
>
>    
this is needed for making an embedded distro. on an embedded distro 
development files (*.la), static libs (*.la), docu and manfiles are not 
needed. it is easyer to copy some libs to the target then delete 50 
other files from target. and you have the full control which files are 
on the target. this does every embedded distro (buildroot, geexbox, ...)

Stephan

-- 
               ### OpenELEC.tv ###
The free and open Mediacenter Distribution 4 you
              http://www.openelec.tv


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to