On Tuesday, 06 October 2009, at 21:52:42 (+0200), Kim Woelders wrote: > It seems to me that you are making Eterm e17 compliant in stead of making > e17 MWM hint compliant.
I think he did that too. My thought was to make Eterm more EWMH compliant. Do you feel that this patch fails to accomplish that? > I don't think _MOTIF_WM_HINTS should be listed in _NET_SUPPORTED at > all. It just makes no sense. EWMH unaware apps will certainly never > look there. It doesn't seem to me that this would break anything, though (speaking specifically about the Eterm patch, not what should/shouldn't be done to E). > If anything should be changed here, I'd consider removing the test > for _MOTIF_WM_INFO (and going override-redirect if not set) and just > set the MWM hint if borderless is requested. What are your thoughts on why you'd go this route as opposed to supporting the additional netwm-based mechanism? The patch seemed reasonable to me (Hannes had me review it before he committed), but I'm open to other suggestions as well. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <m...@kainx.org> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I gave you my purity, and my purity you stole. Did you think I wouldn't recognize this compromise? Am I just to stupid to realize? Stale incense, old sweat, and lies, lies, lies." -- Nine Inch Nails, "sin" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
