On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:33 +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote : > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:44:54 +0100 Albin Tonnerre <[email protected]> > said: > > > On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:45 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote : > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Albin Tonnerre<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > Here's a bug report that got submitted on the Debian BTS, with a patch > > > > allowing embryo to compile on debian/hurd (and more generally on systems > > > > were PATH_MAX is udefined). > > > > > > I could apply this patch, but I fear it's nothing compared to the > > > whole EFL where PATH_MAX is heavily used. I guess that a better option > > > is to define PATH_MAX = 4096/1024/something-user-specified in > > > config.h, which should be included in every source file anyway. With > > > that new .m4, we could just copy it to all efl projects and call the > > > macro from configure.ac and fix them in the same way. > > > > Would the following patch do the trick? > > hmmm... platforms that dont have a PATH_MAX. ewwwww. > > well it'd need to not just be added, but be used and everything made sure to > include config.h if it doesnt explicitly or implicitly yet
Or, as initially suggested in the debian bugreports, we could just stop using PATH_MAX and use dynamic allocations. The bug submitter submitted patches for that. What do you prefer ? Regards, -- Albin Tonnerre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
