Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:58:26 +0100 Peter Wehrfritz <peter.wehrfr...@web.de> > said: > > >> Albin Tonnerre wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:19 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : >>> >>> >>>> why not moving ecore_txt to eina, btw ? >>>> >>>> >>> As far as I understand it, eina is about providing data types. IMHO neither >>> ecore_str nor ecore_txt fit in that category. >>> >>> >> Right, nor does ecore_file, but it seems that the tendency is to put >> everything into to eina which could be used by ecore and evas. >> > > how is "putting everything in ecore" and moving "everything to eina" any > better? you're just shuffling pile of paper from desk a to desk b.
I haven't said it is better, nor do I think it is better. I think eina should stay at what its intent was, an ADT lib. If people feel that a file abstraction (that does not depend on the ecore loop) should be shared between ecore and evas, then create a new lib. I think any lib should have a technical scope and not a scope which is defined by bridging evas and ecore. Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
