Hey,

While compiling ecore I am getting the following error

ecore_evas_x.c: In function ‘ecore_evas_gl_x11_pre_post_swap_callback_set’:
ecore_evas_x.c:2901: error: ‘Evas_Engine_Info_GL_X11’ has no member named
‘callback’
ecore_evas_x.c:2902: error: ‘Evas_Engine_Info_GL_X11’ has no member named
‘callback’
ecore_evas_x.c:2903: error: ‘Evas_Engine_Info_GL_X11’ has no member named
‘callback’

I checked out the latest version from svn from svn co
http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/ecore ecore-svn (checkout revision
45990).

What could be wrong? I checked in the irc but could not find an answer. I am
running Ubuntu 9.04

Thanks in advance.

Karteek

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM, <
enlightenment-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Send enlightenment-devel mailing list submissions to
>        enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        enlightenment-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        enlightenment-devel-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of enlightenment-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Merge some E-MODULES-EXTRA in e/src/modules,  remove some?
>      (P Purkayastha)
>   2. Re: Merge some E-MODULES-EXTRA in e/src/modules,  remove
>      some? (Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri)
>   3. Re: Moving packaging out of trunk? (Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri)
>   4. Re: Moving packaging out of trunk? (Thomas Gst?dtner)
>   5. [ELEMENTARY] Entry scrolled patch. (St?phane BAULAND)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:27:51 -0500
> From: P Purkayastha <ppu...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Merge some E-MODULES-EXTRA in e/src/modules,
>        remove some?
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <201002081127.51308.ppu...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Monday 08 February 2010 09:45:46 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >    - tiling (I bet this one is not maintained, and what it does can be
> > replaced by illume2's policies)
>
> I use tiling quite frequently. I use it (when I am working with latex) in
> the per-desktop setting. So, one desktop out of the 4 of my desktops is in
> tiling mode and the rest are in the default e17 mode.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:03:52 -0200
> From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi>
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Merge some E-MODULES-EXTRA in e/src/modules,
>        remove  some?
> To: David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com>
> Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>        <b1f2b8c41002080903o39217eetbdd8d759ad833...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:46 PM, David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:45:46 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> >
> >> As far as I know, the following modules are maintained, solid and
> >> useful (to their extent) to be merged in e/src/modules, being declared
> >> as "official and trustworthy":
> >>
> >> ? - notification (I use and maintain it)
> >> ? - tclock (actually we should merge it with official clock)
> >
> > I agree with merging tclock and clock, and I think I did that long ago.
> > I would go as far as merging it with calendar to, since all that is is a
> > date display with a popup. ?I remember raster saying he did not want
> > them merged, as clock is an example of pure edj, and he wanted it to
> > stay that way. ?Tclock has a configuration window, so it's not pure
> > edj.
>
> This is no strong argument, as the gadget itself will still be
> pure-edj. The config dialog is orthogonal and should stay like that.
>
> I'd go further and say that this would be an even better argument of
> having one single module with 2 radically different views (analog and
> digital) just changing the group.
>
> I'd not merge it with calendar, but I'd make the clock popup better
> and more useful, including date, weekday name. Also good to have is
> timezone support, so I can have 2-3 clocks with different timezones
> while traveling -- just need couple of embryo calls to convert between
> seconds and break-down time, similar to gmtime() and mktime().
>
>
>
> >> The following modules must be merged between their variations, with
> >> the resulting module being possible to be merged in tree:
> >> ? ?- forecasts, eweather, weather: why 3 modules to do the same thing?
> >> choose one and ditch the others, merging useful features of them.
> >> eweather is currently too big UI-wise, but its libeweather seems nice
> >> and useful. So have a smaller/smarter UI for eweather and remove the
> >> others?
> >
> > I dunno about the new one, but the old two get their weather info from
> > different sources. ?Merging is good, but choice of weather source is
> > also good. ?Having several sources of info is even better, in case one
> > gets broken, or withdrawn, or whatever.
>
> libeweather was all about different sources AFAIK.
>
> What none of these modules do is to listen for mode->offline and stop
> trying to fetch things while E17 is offline, doing useless calls just
> to timeout. So far, e17/connman already exposes offline state
> (forced), but one could use e_dbus/connman to query current state and
> if offline no internet activity would be done -- think about airplanes
> and battery savings.
>
>
> > I suspect you will see the same sort of bun fight there was over EWL /
> > ETK, two camps with different ideas about how to do things going in
> > their separate ways.
>
> No. Unlike the toolkit stuff, this is not reasonable to have different
> modules. I'd rather pick one and delete the rest that allow this kind
> of useless segmentation :-/
>
>
>
> > I would also merge in the moon module, when the moon is visible in the
> > selected location, show it in the correct phase. ?Showing eclipses
> > would be cool once sun and moon are being shown in the same module.
>
> +1 there!
>
>
> > I also had a thought that the rain and snow module would be cool to
> > have them respond to the weather module. ?Raining when it's really
> > raining, snowing when it's really snowing, even going as far as snowing
> > heavily when there is a real blizzard outside. ?Maybe even turning on
> > the flame module on really hot days? ?lol
> >
> > Then someone would have to write lightning and fog modules....
>
> I like this idea. It's useless, but coll useless is nice... after all
> these are eye-candy modules, they could be merged and use libeweather
> to rock the world.
>
>
>
>
> >> I don't know about the following, are they useful (in which way) are
> >> they maintained (who)?
> >> ? ?- alarm
> >> ? ?- cpu
> >> ? ?- diskio
> >> ? ?- emu
> >> ? ?- execwatch
> >> ? ?- iiirk
> >> ? ?- language
> >> ? ?- mail
> >> ? ?- mem
> >> ? ?- net
> >> ? ?- news
> >> ? ?- taskbar
> >> ? ?- tiling (I bet this one is not maintained, and what it does can be
> >> replaced by illume2's policies)
> >> ? ?- uptime
> >> ? ?- winselector
> >> ? ?- wlan
> >
> > CPU, diskio, mem, net, and wlan I always wanted to replace with
> > something more like gkrellm. ?As it is I have a honking big gkrellm
> > taking up about half my screen pinned to my desktop. ?I would rather it
> > was integrated into the e17 desktop like everything else. ?I have some
> > ideas about how to do that well, but lack the time. ?I wanted to add
> > that sort of thing to emu (you can see stuff about that in the emu
> > docs).
> >
> > Emu itself keeps working despite the bit rot, though I don't check it
> > that often. ?I'm the maintainer for it, but I never had the time to
> > take it to the places it was meant to go. ?Dunno if it is useful to
> > anyone, but I would not move it to core. ?I do have some new menu stuff
> > to add to it, but that got put on hold to.
> >
> > Uptime I use, it's the one thing I could move out of gkrellm. ?lol
>
> yeah. this is a good idea, having a "monitors" module that packs all
> these stuff into single blob that you could choose per-gadget
> displays, being a good replacement for gkrellm.
>
>
> > A minor change to the language module ?would actually make it useful for
> > me to switch between two layouts for the same language. ?It used to be
> > able to do this, but somehow got stuck in "one language, one layout
> > allowed" some time ago.
> >
> > While I'm in a griping about modules mood - I fixed the temperature
> > module long ago to allow a choice between more than the first three
> > temperatures (the CPU temp on my motherboard is the fourth one, and
> > that's the important one for me). ?Someone changed it back to three,
> > and now I see there is no choice at all. ?It currently shows the first
> > temperature, which on my motherboard is the PSU, and my PSU does not
> > even have a temperature sensor, so completely useless to me. ?I'm
> > stuck with using the gkrellm again. sigh
>
> fix it, you have the knowledge and the commit access... maybe not just
> the time, but try to find some time to improve our beloved wm :-)
>
>
>
> --
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
> --------------------------------------
> MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
> Skype: gsbarbieri
> Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:06:59 -0200
> From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi>
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Moving packaging out of trunk?
> To: Thomas Gst?dtner <tho...@gstaedtner.net>
> Cc: e <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <b1f2b8c41002080906h25c2def4k5456f124cd1fb...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Thomas Gst?dtner <tho...@gstaedtner.net>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 15:26, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I'm thinking about moving /trunk/packaging down to /, same level as
> >> BROKEN, OLD, trunk, tags and branches. Do you see any problem with
> >> that?
> >>
> >
> > Think it's a good idea, because almost nobody (mostly not even
> > developers) needs that stuff at all.
>
> yes, and I see not much reasoning to have trunk/branches for those as well.
>
> Moreover, I just checked and the debian packaging is quite abused and
> contains couple of tarballs in extras, 11mb of useless tarballs :-/
>
>
> --
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
> --------------------------------------
> MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
> Skype: gsbarbieri
> Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:00:43 +0100
> From: Thomas Gst?dtner <tho...@gstaedtner.net>
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Moving packaging out of trunk?
> To: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi>
> Cc: e <enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <c16a574a1002080900q7990f3f3ua733b82dff059...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 15:26, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm thinking about moving /trunk/packaging down to /, same level as
> > BROKEN, OLD, trunk, tags and branches. Do you see any problem with
> > that?
> >
>
> Think it's a good idea, because almost nobody (mostly not even
> developers) needs that stuff at all.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:03:06 +0100
> From: St?phane BAULAND <joligar...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [E-devel] [ELEMENTARY] Entry scrolled patch.
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>        <b062a51e1002081103j69ac3ac0n72f8c38202270...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi !
>
> As gustavo ask, i removed all scroller + entries from test_entry.c in
> elementary testsuite. I replaced them by scrolled_entry.
>
> Here is the patch,
>
> See you.
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: elm_scrolled_entry_test.patch
> Type: text/x-patch
> Size: 11068 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
> Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the
> business
> Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
> Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
>
> End of enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 46, Issue 19
> ***************************************************
>



-- 
Mail me: karteek.adda...@gmail.com
Call me:+919772974577
Tweet me:http://www.twitter.com/k4rt33k
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to