On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:01 PM, P Purkayastha <ppu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Friday 26 February 2010 18:24:38 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>> Quaker, the only soul that tried to save Entrance, said he has no time >>> to do it now. He is experimenting with some replacement using >>> Elementary, but it is still rough >>> >>> That said, entrance should move to OLD/ in few days if nobody complain >>> with a good reason. :-) >> >> Is "I am using entrance to (literally) gain entrance to e17 daily" a good >> reason? ;-) > > no :-) > > really, I'd love to stop slowing down my boot by around 5 seconds by > running useless gdm, but it works more often than entrance. > > I guess we should have a login manager, and it should not take 10 > years to have it... but until someone steps as the official maintainer > and fix the current problems, moving it is the best to avoid confusion > (the first step after users being amazed with e17 is to try entrance > and tears shows...) imho, the old entrance should never have been deleted. And the new one should have been called entrance2. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
