On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> it's a reminder : tomorrow, the following functions / directories will e
>>> removed :
>>>
>>>  * eina_error (parts that are deprecated by eina_log)
>>
>> these were removed already!
>
> indeed. Last time i checked, there were still there. i missed the mail
>
>>>  * Evas_Data.h and src/lib/data
>>>  * ecore_txt
>>>  * ecore_con_dns
>>>
>>> should ecore_config really removed from the svn or just disabled in ecore
>>> ?
>>
>> it is disabled already.
>
> i know. My question is : should we let it like that, or should we really
> remove it ?

IMHO we should just remove. Eet is a better replacement, however maybe
we need some examples... See Rui, from Elmdentica, he is using eet
much like ecore-config, and it's not good... if we have simple
examples on how to save simple single-blob configurations and another
more advanced for linked lists/hashes, people will port their
applications more easily.

BR,

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to