On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christopher Michael <cpmicha...@comcast.net> wrote: > On 03/08/2010 07:50 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Enlightenment SVN >> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: >>> Log: >>> Add macros (actually defines like hint_fill_set) for expand_set to >>> make it easier for people to know that weight_set handles expansion. >>> >> ouch! these macros will make it more error-prone and confusing, not >> less. Expand would be boolean, but we get double values... meaning? >> >> I'd rather add static inline functions that would check and convert >> parameters. >> >> > > How are they going to make it more error prone ? They are exactly like > the fill_set macros ? By your boolean logic there, wouldn't that apply > to fill_set also ? >
I'd say yes. If we make one inline and converting as needed, so should we do with the other. > dh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
