On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Brett Nash wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 07:47:45 +0200 (CEST) > Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:56:26 +0800 Tom Haste <[email protected]> >>> said: >>> >>>> So... >>>> >>>> We're adding a patch that packagers use to make LUA install >>>> correctly, so wouldnt that make E more difficult to package? Since >>>> its effecting the install of LUA? Its early in the morning here so >>>> it may just be my squishy morning brain not understanding the idea. >>> >>> no no no.. WE are not adding the patch. WE are just assuming the >>> lua install is "sane" (ie provides a .pc file etc.) and expect the >>> installed lua to be patched and set up properly. :) >> >> technically speaking, the problem is the same than zlib or libjpeg, >> and we never complained that they don't have a .pc file. It would be >> easier, of course, to have one (btw, zlib 1.2.4 has one, now. The >> libjpeg maintainer does not want to add one, though) > > At least you don't need to patch their Makefile to get dynamic > libraries however. they also removed dynamic lib ??? > And Lua _removed_ the .pc that was there. yes. You saw my mails to their ML, iirc :-) Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
