On 04/10/2010 08:36 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Christopher Michael
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> On 04/10/2010 08:14 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> <[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to call a voting to dump Exebuf and use Everything by
>>>> default. It is fancier, it is more powerful and i see no reason to not
>>>> do it. exebuf can be then disabled or just removed from SVN, as well
>>>> as its conf_exebuf.
>>>
>>> Voting for making Everything default :) I'm not sure if exebuf needs
>>> to be removed as some just want the simple app launcher.
>>
>> Yea, I vote for leaving things as they are. Exebuf was designed to be
>> just a simple launcher to be able to run apps. It's light, simple for
>> users to understand, and fast. If someone wants the added "fluff" of
>> Everything, they can still enable that.
>>
>
> For regular use, Everything is just the same as exebuf, as light, as
> simple... drop in replacement. Just type and press enter. That's it.
> But if you want more, you get more.
>
> IMHO it makes no sense to keep both. AFAIK raster is the one
> maintaining exebuf, as he has many, many stuff in SVN I guess he
> wouldn't be jealous to drop exebuf to get everything in. Actually it
> would be less work on his back, as Hannes is doing an amazing
> maintenance work with "Everything". :-)
>
> BR,
>
Eh, doesn't matter to me really. Do whatever you want...I don't use 
either of them anyway :)

dh


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to