On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 15:29, William Keaney <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> udisks only allows mounting of drives that are in fstab as of now, so
>> it seems like this might be the case.  Then again, there are still a
>> few things missing from it so it may just destroy your hopes and dreams
>> like hal did :)
>>
> I actually find this slightly concerning.  What about removable media?  I
> actually thought that NOT requiring users to edit fstab for every. single.
> disk. they plug in was a Good Thing(tm).  I do agree that HAL's inability to
> cooperate with fstab is a problem, but I don't think that abandoning
> hotpluggable removable media is a valid solution either.

That is not the case.
It isn't true, that everything has to be in the fstab to enable
devicekit-disks to mount it or whatsoever.
Like it is with hal now, both is possible, /etc/fstab or
"auto"-mounting by devicekit.
The difference is, that this now works better. Devicekit-disks can
mount fstab entries, as well as attached drives without an fstab
entry, and much more.
All in all, there is no loss in features by dropping hal in favor of
device-kit, it just works better and is generally simpler.

So you will still be able to hotplug as user, no problems there at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to