On Thu, 20 May 2010, David Seikel wrote:
> I should stop replying to this list shortly after waking up. Apologies > to Michael for sending this direct to you instead of the list. > > On Wed, 19 May 2010 04:15:52 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> udev support is gradually making its way into e17 as a (superior) >> alternative to hal, and I need more testers to tell me when stuff >> breaks! So far I've written in support for illume2 and the battery >> module. If you use these and you have udev, you should be firing up >> eeze and building e with --enable-device-udev! >> >> Additionally, I need people to run the eeze_udev test app more and >> report back if it doesn't work like you think it should (pretty >> obvious from the messages I put in). All bugs that I knew about have >> been fixed, but old/buggy udev versions may still require more >> workarounds and/or compat code. > > Looking forward to the temperature module changes if that is supported, > and hoping it actually makes sense for my motherboard. AND STAYS THAT > WAY! It pissed me off that the changes I made went away. Now there is > no choice about which temperature sensor is read, and the one it shows > is the only one I have no actual hardware for. Useless. > > Don't want to go making those changes again (from a choice of 3 to a > choice of 4), only to have someone remove that and go the other way (no > choice) in an effort to "simplify" things for the masses. That's gnome > policy. not ours. That sort of choice is what advanced settings are > for dammit. do you know in which revision the temp module was simplified ? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
