On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:58:53 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log: > Slave mode: 1st dev. cycle > Tests with a Java process listening on the other side did suceed. > Only issue still open is the nil value support. Editje will listen > on an specified port for an xml-rpc connection. Two testing commands > are there, but the protocol is going to be defined now. > > When some Java code gets done, we'll have an xml-rpc client on > Editje's side too, because the procotol needs two-way calls. > > By: Gustavo Lima Chaves <gl...@profusion.mobi> > > > Author: sachiel > Date: 2010-06-16 13:58:53 -0700 (Wed, 16 Jun 2010) > New Revision: 49709 XML? Do we HAVE to use that bloated crap? It was fair enough with FDO and SVG stuff, someone else defined those standards, they are popular, so we had to grin and go with it. If we are defining our own protocol, and it looks like we are if we have to write both sides of the system, why not use something waaay more efficient than XML? -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel