On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Brett Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > Well the I did actually check the code before I removed the attributes. The > pure was obviously wrong as the code has side effects. Since the return > value is both cached internally and called from within the same file without > checking the results it's just making noise as it stands. > > When the attribute was added whoever did it should have taken the time to > suppress the warnings that were made then.
my bad, but maybe it was to be fixed and not suppressed? :-P -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [email protected] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
