Hey,

when reading part of EFL I also encountered those (forgotten?) const-keywords.
If you take 'type const name' vs. 'const type name' into account as
well, those misstakes are all over the place.
Somebody told me to not care too much about it, but I'd be with you
just because of 'correctness'.
But maybe this coccinelle stuff (lucas) can help us fixing this
formaility all over EFL? But what are even more important, are the
opinions of the lead devs on this.

BR,

Leif

2010/7/10 Fabiano Fidêncio <fiden...@profusion.mobi>:
> In below functions, I'm changing the type of the parameter from
> "Evas_Object *" to "const  Evas_Object *", as should be in all *_get()
> functions:
>
> elm_widget_drag_lock_x_get()
> elm_widget_drag_lock_y_get()
> elm_widget_drag_child_locked_x_get()
> elm_widget_drag_child_locked_y_get()
>
> May someone apply it, please?
>
> BR,
> --
> Fabiano Fidêncio
> ProFUSION embedded systems
> http://www.profusion.mobi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to