On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> dso fix - part of it isnt in e- it's in edbus.
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2010-07-11 17:12:17 -0700 (Sun, 11 Jul 2010)
> New Revision: 50187
>
> Modified:
> trunk/e_dbus/configure.ac trunk/e_dbus/edbus.pc.in
>
> Modified: trunk/e_dbus/configure.ac
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/e_dbus/configure.ac 2010-07-11 23:59:06 UTC (rev 50186)
> +++ trunk/e_dbus/configure.ac 2010-07-12 00:12:17 UTC (rev 50187)
> @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@
>
> ### Checks for libraries
>
> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([DBUS], [dbus-1 >= 0.62])
> +AC_SUBST(DBUS_LIBS)
> +
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([EDBUS], [ecore >= 0.9.9 eina-0 dbus-1 >= 0.62])
>
> # Find out the version of DBUS we're using
>
> Modified: trunk/e_dbus/edbus.pc.in
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/e_dbus/edbus.pc.in 2010-07-11 23:59:06 UTC (rev 50186)
> +++ trunk/e_dbus/edbus.pc.in 2010-07-12 00:12:17 UTC (rev 50187)
> @@ -7,5 +7,5 @@
> Description: DBus convenience library
> @pkgconfig_requires_private@: @requirement_edbus@
> Version: @VERSION@
> -Libs: -L${libdir} -ledbus
> +Libs: -L${libdir} -ledbus @DBUS_LIBS@
> Cflags: -I${includedir}/e_db...@vmaj@
I've already asked to pkg-config dev what should be done in that case :
Libs should not contains such libs. Btw, you check a .pc file, here, so
it's Requirements.private that should be updated, that is, adding dbus-1
in requirement_edbus
Vincent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
