On 08/02/2010 05:46 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Michael > <cpmicha...@comcast.net> wrote: >> On 08/02/2010 05:19 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Enlightenment SVN >>> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: >>>> Log: >>>> Rename 'same named' macros. >>>> >>>> NB - Please use different macro names in the future for stuff like this >>>> (ie: not the same macro name in each file) as it spits nasty compiler >>>> warnings when compiling w/ amalgamation. >>> >>> no, if you do such local macros, undef them after you're done with it. >>> Usually the purpose of the macro is to type less and adding a prefix >>> does not help :-P >>> >> Well, yea, undef is cool too :) (not sure how that will affect >> amalgamation tho as both macros would still have the same name in this >> case). >> > > Once #undef`ed, it ceases to exist. You can #define it again later > and should not give any problems. >
Ok, well either way doesn't matter to me ;) I just hate seeing compiler warnings for something that is pretty simple to avoid if people just took an extra 5 seconds to either use a different name, or undef them :) dh >> dh >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
