Am Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:12:16 +1000 schrieb David Seikel:
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:56:03 -0400 Christopher Michael
> <cpmicha...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On 08/09/2010 01:49 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > > If I remember correctly there are some edj (i.e already compiled
> > > edc's) in svn.
> > > Don't forget to update them, or better yet, create a Makefile for
> > > them and start shipping only edc's.
> > >
> > That would be the preferred way (edc), so that future things like
> > that do not require too much manual updating...the edj files can
> > just be remade during the build process.
>
> I have always insisted that we store edc source files in SVN and not
> edj files. This is yet one more good reason to. Raster said that edj
> is an image format like PNG, but PNG is not compiled from source, so
> that argument is not a good one. edj files are compiled from source,
> so we should ALWAYS put the source in SVN and suitable makefiles to
> compile them.
I couldn't agree that. Whats's about people creating edj files with
editje? I've one application where I never wrote edc files. So how
should I check in edc files in this case? Decompile before commit? :-)
regards
Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
