On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:09:20 +0200, Lucas De Marchi  
<lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Kim Woelders <k...@woelders.dk> wrote:
>> I think we are in the personal taste department here, so it's probably
>> dangerous just to change this all over.
>
> I took embryo as the first victim because it has examples of most of
> the cases. I would really like to apply the changes universally, but
> once people start complaining on his project, I stop. Not forcing
> anything in anyone here... I just like the idea of having a uniform
> style along the entire repository. And then, once people know what the
> style is, it'll be preserved :-D
>
>>
>> As for e16 I think I changed my mind somewhere along the way in favor of
>> what you suggest, so e16 is a bit messy here :)
>> Feel free to make these changes in the E16 subtree.
>
> Good!! I think most of them are in E16 dir :-D
>
>>
>> One question though - there are a lot of constructions like
>>
>>  if ((p = strchr(s, ' ')) == NULL)
>>      return 0;
>>
>> I assume this would be changed to
>>
>>  if (!(p = strchr(s, ' ')))
>>      return 0;
>
> As of now, yes.
>
>>
>> which I don't like much. I'd prefer
>>
>>  p = strchr(s, ' ');
>>  if (!p)
>>      return 0;
>>
>> Would it be possible to teach coccinelle that? :)
>
> Yes, except that for 'while', 'for' and maybe other cases it will not
> work. If we do that, we'll introduce a bug. Then, what do I do? Keep
> them different for "if / while / for / '?' / other_conditions",
> introduce a bug or just apply as is?
>
If this causes trouble just forget about it. In any case, please don't  
introduce bugs :)

/Kim


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to