On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:14:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:02:33 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> > said: > > > > > I would add, run eina and eet tests and coverage suite on your > > > > prefered target to see if anything did go wrong. This should be > > > > running just fine on x86 (32 and 64 bits), ARM, MIPS and SPARC. > > > > I have currently no report on PowerPC or other exotic > > > > architecture. So if you have access to this kind of hardware, > > > > please run the tests ! > > > > > > hmm - i'd say this is part of the post-alpha testing process. i > > > agree it needs to be done. i don't think it needs to be done FOR > > > an alpha release. but definitely part of the process to get to > > > release. i've got 32bit x86 and armsies myself. > > > > I can no doubt throw this at my PS3 if I get time, that will cover > > PowerPC. I'm not ready to even start to squeeze EFL onto my 486 > > based embedded computer, that's a future TODO. > > 486 i'd say is already covered by x86-32bit anyway. all asm is > already #ifdefed and checked compile and runtime - it'd have broken > on other archs if it wasn't. :) but ppc will be useful. Remember I used to do performance testing of E17 on a P100? While it's a rather beefy 486, I feel like I'm lowering my standards. Note - I have no plans to port EFL to the 20MHz PIC I'm also working on. There are things even I'm not crazy enough to try. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
