On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:54:22 -0300 Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> said:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Why not just use calloc there? > > Because i've just finished a script to convert those cases to calloc > and I want to test :-D > > Lucas De Marchi most mallocs probably should be callocs.. EXCEPT for some cases. where its performance sensetive or perhaps huge allocations will happen and thus filling with 0 is "wasted" to the point of possibly measurable. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
