On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Eduardo Felipe <eduardofelip...@gmail.com> wrote: > in the good old days, before the edje file format rewrite, one was > able to create programs without name. If one needed to use that > program in an action or after clausule, one needed to declare the > name. But for programs that only reacts to signals so the name is not > relevant. > > Sachiel says now we need a name. No matter what. So I created this > workaround. It let's edje create a random name if one wasn't > explicitly set. Just trying to make things easier and maintain > compatibility with edcs I already wrote.
I am not really sure of the solution. Introduction of a new program name, means that we need to check that it doesn't clash with existing code, but it also imply that when calling edje_decc they will have a name that doesn't means anything. Maybe we can just relax the rules and authorize back anoymous program with empty name. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
