On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]> wrote: > just a note.. other than hunting bugs (which i have been doing), 2 things need > doing for a release > > 1. docs (api docs). these: > > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/eina/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/eet/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/evas/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/ecore/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/embryo/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/edje/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/e_dbus/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/efreet/ > http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/eeze/ > > 2. proper wiki pages per lib. these: > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Eina > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Eet > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Evas > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Ecore > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Embryo > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Edje > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/E_Dbus > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Efreet > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Eeze > > > the api docs need to be technical and cover core details of the library. the > wiki page should be a more general overview - with maybe some screenshots, > examples, bullet point short-list of things the library does, and anything > else > marketing-like that makes it look good. to some extent something like this is > some of the way there: > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/EFLOverview > > (need to fix crudely drawn diagrams). :) > > some of the wiki pages are good - mostly there, some are very empty, some > probably don't have a lot to say. but we do need to fill them in. this will be > the first thing people look at for info about libraries. get them started. > examples, things to get people excited, links to youtube videos of things > running and so on.
I would like to point that wikipedia entry is not in a good shape : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlightenment_Foundation_Libraries I did a quick update removing obviously old description, but this need to be taken care also. Look at what QT and GTK entries : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(framework) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK I think we need to add some prettyness there too. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
