> elm_gengrid_item_size_set is called in the code, but the value is > calculated depending on the size of the container. When I add items in > it, the first time the container objet is 0x0. After that the > container is resized, the signal resized is sent and the value of > imte_size_set is calculated to always have the same number of rows.
As I thought. It should be or a missing size_set call or the size_set was depending on something that was returning 0. > but IMO we should check values before dividing. Completely agreed. The only problem I thought of was that if the error was triggered by a missing size_set call and we just added the checkers for 0, the user would have no clue why his items were not being displayed (Aren't they being created? Are they being wrongly positioned outside viewport area?). Maybe a good solution is besides adding the checkers also print an error message in the case of an item of dimension 0x0. Is that good enough? -- Rafael Fonseca ProFUSION embedded systems http://www.profusion.mobi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
