On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 07:39:42 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[email protected]> said:
> > actually... this brings up a bit of an issue. using cpp/cc/gcc to handle > > #includes and macros and #ifdefs and so on was a handy idea... but it > > #creates a > > LOT of problems in the maintainability and portability of edje_cc due to > > relying on a nebulous cpp that may or may not behave as we expect. > > > > i'm thinking post 1.0 a lot of these features should go into edje_cc itself. > > being able to do includes and macros - maybe we can do much more intelligent > > macros that are able to understand the rest of the edc syntax and model. > > cedric had the same kind of idea, actually (writing a specific > preprocessor for edc syntax). great minds think.... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
