On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:25:54 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> said:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:11:27 +0100 > Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:49:53 +0100 > > > Andreas Volz <li...@brachttal.net> wrote: > > >> Am Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:13:59 -0500 schrieb Mike Blumenkrantz: > > >> > > >> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:44:00 +0900 > > >> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > main_fd_handler_add() Failed to add > > >> > > > poll on fd 18 (errno = 17)! ERR<14518>:ecore ecore.c:227 > > >> > > > _ecore_magic_fail() *** ECORE ERROR: Ecore Magic Check Failed!!! > > >> > > > *** IN FUNCTION: ecore_main_fd_handler_active_set() > > >> > > > ERR<14518>:ecore ecore.c:229 _ecore_magic_fail() Input handle > > >> > > > pointer is NULL! ERR<14518>:ecore ecore.c:240 _ecore_magic_fail() > > >> > > > *** NAUGHTY PROGRAMMER!!! *** SPANK SPANK SPANK!!! > > >> > > > *** Now go fix your code. Tut tut tut! > > >> > > > ERR<14518>:ecore ecore_main.c:758 ecore_main_fd_handler_add() > > >> > > > Failed to add poll on fd 18 (errno = 17)! ERR<14518>:ecore > > >> > > > ecore.c:227 _ecore_magic_fail() *** ECORE ERROR: Ecore Magic > > >> > > > Check Failed!!! > > >> > Try disabling epoll support in ecore and see if you still get this > > >> > same same error. > > >> > > >> I compiled with --disable-epoll and all works again. I tied to update > > >> to an older revision and use --enable-epoll, but compilation failed. > > >> > > >> I don't know what's the functional meaning of this option, but I'm > > >> happy with disabling it. :-) > > >> > > >> regards > > >> Andreas > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> Lotusphere 2011 > > >> Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > > >> to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > > >> to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list > > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > The current epoll code will error when you try to add the same fd twice > > > (bad behavior to begin with), so your only choice is to not use epoll > > > currently. This may change in the future depending on the whims of the > > > other Mike. > > > > Does that mean, I can't have two different callback watching the same fd ? > With epoll I think not. that actually wouldnt work right anyway - you fd HANDLERS ... handle an fd - that is handle the reads and writes to/from it when its needed. 2 fd handlers for the same fd will fail badly ad 1 fd handler will get in first and do a read for example - then "take the data" - the second will not be able to read that data anymore. it's gone. already read. so... it never made any sense to hand 2 fd handlers for 1 fd. it's pretty much an invalid thing to do. so i don't think this is a epoll vs select thing here. it just should never have happened or worked right anyway. epoll just errors out differently. the select code doesnt - you just get implicit errors instead as above. so the question is... is it really adding the same fd twice - and if so.. why was it doing that? that "userspace" code needs fixing if it did. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
