On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:54:02 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 03:47:06 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[email protected]> > said: > > > is that change correct ? > > yes. i kept sources floatign about - but no binary is built. in case someone > for some bizarre reasons needs/wants edje_convert - they can hand-build it > themselves, but its otherwise dormant and the actual source will go over time. > > > Also, in edje_data.c, it is said that _edje_edd_init() and > > _edje_edd_shutdown() should be removed. They appear in edje_private.h and > > edje_main.c > > yes - correct. those need to go. but just in case someone wants to build it... > stay for the moment. > > > whay aren't the edje_convert sources of the binary removed ? > > > > Vincent Couldn't they just check out an old revision if they wanted it? -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
