Em 29-01-2011 09:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) escreveu: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri<[email protected]> > said: > >> >> >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. >>>> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this >>>> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. >>>> >>>> >>> I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of >>> documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. >> >> if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. > > i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new > release we have them all collected already. fixing a typo in some docs or > "fixing code formatting" isnt worthy of a changelog. > > there isnt black and white here. its a matter of good judgment. if we see > these > things as black& white we w0ill have a useless changelog. thats what svn's > log > is for. if you implement some feature over several days and many commits, > there > is no need for many changelog entires. there is only the need for 1 changelog > saying that you added the feature.
Can we please use a common format for changelog? I propose following the GNU standard which is quite common: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs Best, Rui ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
