Em 04-02-2011 09:36, Cedric BAIL escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra<[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>> Em 04-02-2011 08:27, Cedric BAIL escreveu:
>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra<[email protected]>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Em 25-01-2011 05:36, Ian Caldwell escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets hear your thoughts...
>>>>
>>>> Thread safety for ecore!
>>>
>>> Ecore already provide facility to handle thread, thread safety are
>>> really not needed. But Efreet mime type could really be thread safe
>>> that would be highly usefull !
>>
>> How do you make two downloads in the background at the same time, then?
>
> ecore_con_url handle that already for you. It would be a waste of
> ressource to have one download per thread, as you basically just watch
> one fd per download.

Ok, shouldn't that pass to ecore_con then?

Discomfitor told me ecore_con is not thread safe as a reason I can't 
have multiple Azy actions, so I have to have generic functions and 
disable network operations in the UI while one Azy action is in place, 
and then enable them again at the end.

This sucks a bit, I would love to allow people to post messages with Azy 
while Azy downloads in the "background"...

Rui

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world? 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to