On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:03:34 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:25:05 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> said: > > > Should be r56254 > > looking at the code... the bt makes no sense. when that struct is freed... > it's removed from the infos list by ecore_con_server_infos_del. unless the > same struct has been added TWICE... and i dont see that as it'd only got a > single append after the calloc of it. > yeah it's pretty baffling. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
