* Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> [2011-02-25 12:11:43 +0200]: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > I do not agree. AUTHORS is a way to know who really touched a program. that > > could be necessary to have the name of the contributors in case of a licence > > change > > > > > I was talking about the about dialog, not the AUTHORS file.
I think, what Tom did and will probably do for E17 as a whole justifies the mentioning of his name in the dialog. I don't talk about the AUTHORS file itself. Sure thing, only people hacking 'e' should go in e's AUTHORS file. But in order to have E17 do what it does, Tom's work is fundamental. Thus I vote for really adding him (and probably some others) to the dialog. E17 is not 'e' - E17 is 'e', 'eina', 'evas', ... And the dialog is about E17. Just my 2 cents... Marc P.S: Come on guys ... he does a great job! > > -- > Tom. -- Marc Koschewski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel