* Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> [2011-02-25 12:11:43 +0200]:

> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
> 
> > I do not agree. AUTHORS is a way to know who really touched a program. that
> > could be necessary to have the name of the contributors in case of a licence
> > change
> >
> >
> I was talking about the about dialog, not the AUTHORS file.

I think, what Tom did and will probably do for E17 as a whole justifies the
mentioning of his name in the dialog. I don't talk about the AUTHORS file
itself. Sure thing, only people hacking 'e' should go in e's AUTHORS file. But
in order to have E17 do what it does, Tom's work is fundamental. Thus I vote for
really adding him (and probably some others) to the dialog.

E17 is not 'e' - E17 is 'e', 'eina', 'evas', ... And the dialog is about E17.

Just my 2 cents...

Marc

P.S: Come on guys ... he does a great job!

> 
> -- 
> Tom.

-- 
Marc Koschewski

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to