On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:56:27 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) <[email protected]>
said:

2011/3/17 Mike Blumenkrantz <[email protected]>:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:28:44 +0100
[email protected] wrote:

Hi,

Got a complaint from a Mac OS X user that building from trunk fails. The
reason is the v_mic number:

ld: malformed version number: 2.999

After checking I found the reason:

-current_version number
      Specifies the current version number of the library. The current
version of the library can
      be obtained programmatically by the user of the library so it can
determine exactly which
      version of the library it is using.  The format of number is X[.Y
[.Z]] where X must be a
      positive non-zero number less than or equal to 65535, and .Y and .Z
are optional and if
      present must be non-negative numbers less than or equal to 255.  If
the version number is
      not specified, it has a value of 0.  This option is also called
-dylib_current_version for
      compatibility.

So on OS X v_mic can't be larger than 255. Should we make this default for
all platforms, or just for darwin?

S.

I think just setting it to 99 on all platforms would be sufficient, it's
unlikely that we'll ever get that high?


Most of the times you are way higher than that.

we canty change version as all the .999 versions now installed from trunk will
be newer than the .99 that is now newer. so i guess mac-osx is now unsupported
until we release 1.0.1 bugfix updates or 1.1 you cant use trunk without
modifying the version installed.

so we revert it, and set it to 99 after the next release ?

Vincent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to