On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:23:30 +0200 (CEST) > > Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:12:52 -0700 > >>> "Enlightenment SVN" <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Log: > >>>> add bench for google's cityhash function (64bit, > >>>> http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/) convenient graph of output can be > >>>> found at http://www.enlightenment.org/~discomfitor/hash_bench.png > >>>> > >>>> Author: discomfitor > >>>> Date: 2011-04-12 16:12:52 -0700 (Tue, 12 Apr 2011) > >>>> New Revision: 58610 > >>>> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/58610 > >>>> > >>> All libraries compiled with the same cflags/cxxflags/ldflags/etc, glib > >>> 2.28.5, latest svn eina. It appears that cityhash is identical to > >>> superfast, > >> > >> i'm just wondering: if it's identical, why did you add it ? I would prefer > >> to improve the current hash stuff rather than adding another hash table > >> that is not really faster than other has tables (dj2 inline seems faster) > >> though it's difficult to see what happens between 0 and 1000 > >> > >> Vincent > >> > >>> and > >>> currently none of eina's tested algorithms scale as well as ecore's hash > >>> or glib's hash. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mike Blumenkrantz > >>> Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! > > I only added it to the benchmark, not to the eina library itself. > > and ? is it still useful to have it ? > > Vincent It's useful for people who would be interested in hash function speeds (ie anyone who runs the benchmark). If you really think it's pointless then I'll remove it, but I'm doing a lot of work involving hash functions now and it's good to have an immediate reference. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
