On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:26:23 +0200 Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> said:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:58:43AM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote: > > I'm still wondering aboutefficiency : for example, for pdf rendering, > > shouldn't the use of a pdf generic loader be slower than wht i can achieve > > in eyesight ? > > Only if you fork once per page or something like that. Give it a minimal > input processing like Ghostscript's X11 target and the overhead is going > to mostly vanish. E.g. "open", "render $page $resolution" "close" should > be good enough for most purposes. the generic loader does fork once.. actually it forks AND execs TWICE per load (once for header, once for body). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
