On Tue, 17 May 2011 20:50:09 +0900 WooHyun Jung <wh0705.j...@samsung.com> said:
in svn :) snuck in with a warning commit... oops. sorry - didnt state the patch was in in commit + from you.. sorry! :( > Hello. All. > > I think current _parent_focus function (elm_widget.c) has one problem. > > Following conditional statement(in _parent_focus func) can not cover all > cases. > > > > . > > if (!ret || (!i) || (i != focus_order)) > > _parent_focus(o); > > . > > > > For example, an application calls like follows, > > 1. elm_object_unfocus(a parent of newest focused object); > > 2. elm_object_focus(newest focused object); > > then the parent(unfocused by 1) is still unfocused, even if its child gets > focused(by 2). > > This is because (i == focus_order). > > > > So I made a patch. Can anybody check about this? > > Thanks. > > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
