On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> said:
> > hey > > would it be reasonable to ignore the elm_map.c code if ecore_con is not > available (that is, the exported functions do nothing or return 0 or NULL, > etc.., and all the other code is guarded by HAVE_ECORE_CON) ? > > I think that elm_map is useless without ecore_con not all of elm_map. technically elm_map can work with a local map "database" that is just a set of files on disk in specific directories. it isnt totally bound to requiring a network connection. it'd require support for that but its no different the the osm url scheme. just make it local files. the routing though is a bit of a different ballgame - we'd need a whole route db too and routing engine. i suspect that's going to end up being another process locally (thus ecore_con needed - even if unix sockets used), though in theory it could also be squeezed into a thread. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
