On 29/07/11 03:37, Bruno Dilly wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200 >> Hugo Camboulive <hugo.camboul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header? >>> Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc... that baby is 1.1MB >>> of raw text, and contains every possible elementary widget. (there's a >>> little difference with the header though : this one is made of very few >>> comments) :-D >> yeah, but nobody is arguing that default.edc is terrible. we all agree on >> that >> point. > > it could be a edc file for each widget, and default would be just a > bunch of includes.
I (and probably many others) suggested it many times before, raster is against, I don't remember why. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
