On 11/05/11 14:29, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > e: send hide event for borders even if not visible > > Author: billiob > Date: 2011-11-05 11:29:30 -0700 (Sat, 05 Nov 2011) > New Revision: 64787 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/64787 > > Modified: > trunk/e/src/bin/e_border.c > > Modified: trunk/e/src/bin/e_border.c > =================================================================== > --- trunk/e/src/bin/e_border.c 2011-11-05 17:50:23 UTC (rev 64786) > +++ trunk/e/src/bin/e_border.c 2011-11-05 18:29:30 UTC (rev 64787) > @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ > > E_OBJECT_CHECK(bd); > E_OBJECT_TYPE_CHECK(bd, E_BORDER_TYPE); > - if (!bd->visible) return; > + if (!bd->visible) goto send_event; > ecore_x_window_shadow_tree_flush(); > if (bd->moving) > _e_border_move_end(bd); > @@ -981,6 +981,9 @@ > if (!manage) > ecore_x_window_prop_card32_set(bd->client.win, > E_ATOM_MANAGED,&visible, 1); > > + bd->post_show = 0; > + > +send_event: > if (!stopping) > { > E_Event_Border_Hide *ev; > @@ -991,7 +994,6 @@ > // e_object_breadcrumb_add(E_OBJECT(bd), "border_hide_event"); > ecore_event_add(E_EVENT_BORDER_HIDE, ev, > _e_border_event_border_hide_free, NULL); > } > - bd->post_show = 0; > } > > static void > >
What is the reasoning for this ?? Makes little sense to me to send a hide event for a border that is not visible (ie: not visible on screen or already hidden). If the border is not visible on the screen (or already hidden), then why send a hide event ?? dh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
