On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:14:08 +0200 Tom Hacohen
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 07/11/11 09:07, David Seikel wrote:
> > I plan on pulling out one of those functions (plus others) and
> > replacing them with something more generic later anyway.  But not
> > now.  I'll think it through properly when I do that.  It's just
> > internal support stuff, but at the time I was in my "don't mess
> > with rasters code until I talk with him about it" mode.
> >
> > So one function is const, the other is not.  Casting would have to
> > be done somewhere between them to stop the bitching.
> 
> And hence the spank and my objection to suppressing the errors,
> you'll just end up forgetting.

Spanked on one cheek for suppressing them, on the other for not.

I wont forget, I left a fixme, and all those non generic functions
proliferating is really annoying me.  I'll scratch that itch.

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to