On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:43:06 -0500 Youness Alaoui
<[email protected]> said:

1. you provided a script to do something that wasn't asked for - the request was
not to give them a script. it was for us to do it - and you still haven't
acknowledged that that is no better than what they have now, so what is the
point?

2. i'm not apologizing for something i didn't actually do. as you didn't read
the facts and refuse to, your "condescending bullshit" line is in itself
condescending bullshit - you pretend to know what happened when you won't even
look.

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:46 -0500 Youness Alaoui
> > <[email protected]> said:
> >
> > WE were asked to generate the tarballs. WE... not him. if he wants
> > tarballs he
> > can make them himself. i would never have said no. i can't and won't stop
> > him -
> > he can make the tarballs all he likes! but WE were asked to make them. that
> > means one of us - presumably me, has to generate them UPLOAD them and then
> > TELL
> > SOMEONE they are uploaded and exist! if HE wants tarballs and wants to
> > build
> > them himself.. absolutely. go ahead! by all means! he can also just use
> > make
> > dist which is simpler. but that isn't what was asked for.
> >
> 
> 1 - read what I wrote, I said that for now he used the script, until the
> script gets put on a server on which I don't have access
> 2 - why "presumably me" ?
> 
> 
> >
> > > I haven't proven your point, I don't see where I did. On the contrary, I
> > > proved that you can create a simple script that does it. Who asked for
> > any
> > > announcements? who even asked for uploads? The guy used my script to
> > > generate the tarballs from svn on his own machine and then used the
> > > tarballs in his build system and was happy about it. Ideally, the script
> > > should run on a server in a cron job and copy the files to a publically
> > > available directory, I'm not uploading the files because I don't have
> > > access to such server. But that is outside the scope of what was asked, I
> > > helped him get what he wanted, he's happy about it, he'll continue
> > porting
> > > to BSD or whatever he wants to do with it. In the end, we didn't lose a
> > > contributor, and that's the final goal that was reached (who btw said
> > that
> > > he got demotivated after talking to you because of the way you spoke).
> > > Of course, it's less useful than a make distcheck, that's why an actual
> > > build system would be needed for continuous integration checks, but that
> > is
> > > besides the point. They wanted a tarball, I provided a tarball, nothing
> > > more, nothing less.
> > > Stop assuming what the other person wants, and then make judgment calls
> > on
> > > what you think they may or may not want. That's not how you can build
> > your
> > > community, by closing all doors in the face of everyone who wants to
> > help.
> >
> > dude... did you READ AT ALL WHAT VTORRI ASKED FOR? my god! you really want
> > to
> > just run around with your opinions without ever reading the facts. they
> > asked
> > to HAVE daily snapshots. they aren't asking how THEY can do it themselves.
> > they
> > are asking for them to BE done for them. you OFFERED an alternative.
> >
> > man - YOU demotivate ME. your snide comments, grandstanding on your soapbox
> > without ever bothering to READ the discussion or facts at hand - which you
> > very
> > clearly didn't bother to read, or your understanding of english is not so
> > great. when someone asks to have snapshots - they ask for tarballs, which
> > need
> > to be generated and uploaded. we can generate them on the server, but a
> > cron
> > job is no better than a random svn checkout done by them. if you READ the
> > emails and READ the irc discussion you might have the facts.
> >
> > on email i asked what's so hard about svn. on irc i got the response that
> > they
> > have no idea when to svn checkout because they don't know if it works or
> > not.
> > put that together with a cron job either done by them OR us is the same
> > thing.
> > nothing has improved.
> >
> > pointless email as you're simply not reading the actual content.
> >
> you don't seem to read what I wrote, you ignore the facts.. the facts are
> not the commits or how bad they were, the facts were your attitude and
> condescending bullshit. but yeah,you don't seem to be able to acknowledge
> that, since you're perfect and everyone else is wrong.
> 
> Thank you Vincent and Gustavo for sharing your concerns about this, and
> it's too sad that the new contributor has become another victim of raster's
> poor social skills. That's what I wanted to avoid, that's what I wanted
> raster to understand, and I was hoping for him to reply with something like
> "sorry if I offended you, that wasn't my purpose" and that's it, the guy
> stays with us, but I guess raster has too much pride and is too
> self-centered to recognize his own faults.
> I think I will follow Vincent's advice and not reply to this thread
> anymore, raster clearly showed he has no comprehension of what people are
> trying to tell him here, so this is just an endless drama with no possible
> resolution.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:55:46 -0500 Youness Alaoui
> > > > <[email protected]> said:
> > > >
> > > > so you've basically proven my point - it's the same as an svn
> > checkout...
> > > > and
> > > > that script still doesn't upload them, or make any announcement that
> > they
> > > > have
> > > > been created. it's actually less useful than make distc (or distcheck)
> > and
> > > > much
> > > > longer. there is no quality checking there... and which point it's
> > > > busywork.
> > > >
> > > > > Here, I just wrote a script :
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/devs/kakaroto/create_tarballs.sh
> > > > >
> > > > > It defaults to building tarballs for eina eet evas ecore embryo edje
> > > > efreet
> > > > > e_dbus eeze (list suggested by Vincent), but you can specify any
> > libs you
> > > > > want as arguments.
> > > > > It does the svn export (no .svn dirs) autogens then tars them. I
> > didn't
> > > > > make it do a make distcheck because that requires a Makefile, which
> > > > > requires configure to run, which itself will require dependent
> > libraries.
> > > > > This should be enough for the purposes of providing a simple
> > mechanism (a
> > > > > tarball) to those who do not want to bother with checking out svn.
> > > > > If this could go into whatever server as a cron job, and make it
> > dump the
> > > > > tarballs to a directory somewhere (and let the web server's indexing
> > take
> > > > > care of listing the files), I think that should be enough.
> > > > > Jonathan, let me know if that's all you need or if you need something
> > > > else.
> > > > > And if Carsten was right and you need a guarantee that those
> > tarballs are
> > > > > 'tested and stable', then let the answer be "yes", and let's just
> > assume
> > > > it
> > > > > is stable, the code in svn should be stable and we are in feature
> > freeze
> > > > > already.. also that's what we all use daily so it should be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope that helps.
> > > > > Youness.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Youness Alaoui <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:47:32 -0500 Youness Alaoui
> > > > > >> <[email protected]> said:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Reminds me of some of the stuff I've been saying...
> > > > > >> > As for "don't have time to do tarballs everyday".. well, that's
> > why
> > > > > >> there's
> > > > > >> > something called "scripts" and "cron jobs".. those things exist,
> > > > might
> > > > > >> be
> > > > > >> > good to use these awesome technologies.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> hooray for your snide comments. wonderful attitude. you were not
> > > > there on
> > > > > >> irc,
> > > > > >> nor did you even seem to have read the material at hand (the
> > patches).
> > > > > >> seriously, what's up with you?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > It wasn't my remarks, it was the remarks from someone who wants to
> > > > > > contribute to the project and who got offended by the way you
> > talked to
> > > > > > him. All I did was point out what I said before in the hopes that
> > > > you'll
> > > > > > realize that your own attitude is a problem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> do i suddenly have to be mr. nice to everything? "oh wow! how
> > > > wonderful!
> > > > > >> so
> > > > > >> awesome that you broke evas's api on your openbsd packages. so
> > great
> > > > to
> > > > > >> see.
> > > > > >> we'll love hearing the app developers ask us for help about their
> > > > apps not
> > > > > >> working on openbsd, when we will have zero clue that it was an
> > api/abi
> > > > > >> breakage
> > > > > >> added specifically on openbsd. that's just awesome. please - make
> > more
> > > > > >> patches
> > > > > >> just like that!".
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> if its bad, it's bad. reasons were explicitly given for it being
> > bad.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This has nothing to do with the patches, I didn't know there were
> > > > patches,
> > > > > > I didn't see any patches, and I don't care about them either. My
> > point
> > > > is
> > > > > > you should learn how to talk to people if you don't want to drive
> > away
> > > > all
> > > > > > the contributors and end up alone in the project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> and as for "well just use scripts" - have to write and test those
> > too.
> > > > > >> and if
> > > > > >> its just a cron job... then its NO BETTER THAN A RANDOM SVN
> > CHECKOUT.
> > > > > >> that was
> > > > > >> my point... which you failed to read. if you don't sit down and
> > spend
> > > > at
> > > > > >> least
> > > > > >> some qa time on the tarballs... then its pointless. this is my
> > point
> > > > on a
> > > > > >> mental block. i keep hearing it from people "omg !!!! svn trunk
> > must
> > > > be so
> > > > > >> unstable!!! how can i use it?" - it's the image that just because
> > its
> > > > in
> > > > > >> trunk
> > > > > >> (or head/master/whatever) that it must be so unstable and a
> > tarball
> > > > made
> > > > > >> every
> > > > > >> day is going to be better. it's a RELEASE process of freezing and
> > > > fixing
> > > > > >> just
> > > > > >> bugs that improves quality... not "make dist; scp *.tar.gz ...".
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For you it's no better than a random svn checkout, good, but if
> > they
> > > > want
> > > > > > a tarball, give them a tarball, as for "what if it doesn't build",
> > > > well it
> > > > > > should always build, noone should even commit anything without
> > testing
> > > > his
> > > > > > work and making sure it doesn't break anything.. while breakage
> > does
> > > > > > happen, it's not something that happens 10 times a day, and it's
> > still
> > > > > > fine, if a tarball is fucked, then you can always say "use the one
> > from
> > > > > > tomorrow".
> > > > > > There is a difference between having a build system do a wget and a
> > > > build
> > > > > > system do a svn checkout, maybe that's why they need tarballs, so
> > they
> > > > > > prepare their build system and when the release is out, they just
> > > > change
> > > > > > the URL instead of changing the whole system of downloading the
> > > > image...
> > > > > > And it's not about "svn is unstable" mentality, it's about
> > "tarballs
> > > > are
> > > > > > more convenient".
> > > > > > As for the scripts, no you don't have to write and test those, you
> > can
> > > > say
> > > > > > "ok fine, someone write it and we'll put it on the server as a cron
> > > > job",
> > > > > > if noone does write the script for you, then too bad for them,
> > it's not
> > > > > > your responsability. If you wanted, I would have made the script
> > > > myself..
> > > > > > we already have a script that creates a svn tarball everyday for
> > aMSN,
> > > > you
> > > > > > could reuse the same script basically, and I could adapt it to the
> > EFL.
> > > > > > It's the same as svn? yeah, so what? it's better to help them by
> > giving
> > > > > > out the tarball even if it's the same as svn rather than telling
> > them
> > > > to
> > > > > > fuck off.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > if they require tarballs to
> > > > > >> > > >> test and can't just run svn instead to fetch the source...
> > i
> > > > don't
> > > > > >> have
> > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > >> > > >> time each day to make tarballs when they can just as easily
> > > > fetch
> > > > > >> from
> > > > > >> > > svn.
> > > > > >> > > >> it's the same work on their part. making tarballs is MORE
> > work
> > > > on
> > > > > >> our
> > > > > >> > > part.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > You missed the point, we want to be sure that the final
> > archive
> > > > > >> will be
> > > > > >> > > ok.
> > > > > >> > > > I'm not asking for snapshot on a daily basis, only some rc
> > > > before
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > > final archive.
> > > > > >> > > > (Wait no project did alpha & rc, right ?)
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>> Note that i discuss also with a Mageia e17 maintainer,
> > and he
> > > > > >> told me
> > > > > >> > > that
> > > > > >> > > >>> such snapshots will help him too.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> a snapshot has no more quality than an svn checkout, so
> > other
> > > > than
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >> > > mental
> > > > > >> > > >> block thinking svn == totally unstable/unusable and an
> > > > > >> unwillingness to
> > > > > >> > > use it
> > > > > >> > > >> because of a mental block, i don't see the point.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > yeah a mental block, I think you don't want to know how many
> > > > time I
> > > > > >> > > > have to reroll a dist to get all working and how frustating
> > it
> > > > is.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> a release that has had quality assurance done on it is a
> > > > different
> > > > > >> > > matter - but
> > > > > >> > > >> we arent doing them every day. hell no - not with al the
> > efl
> > > > trees
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> > > have.
> > > > > >> > > >> only chance of that is if we stopped having separate libs
> > and
> > > > just
> > > > > >> > > merged them
> > > > > >> > > >> into a single efl tree.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>> Vincent
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> > > >>> Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> > > >>> Register now
> > > > > >> > > >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > >>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> > > >>> [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> --
> > > > > >> > > >> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
> > > > > >> --------------
> > > > > >> > > >> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > >> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> > > >> Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> > > >> Register now
> > > > > >> > > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> > > >> [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> > > > Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> > > > Register now
> > > > > >> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > --
> > > > > >> > > Bruno Dilly
> > > > > >> > > Senior Developer
> > > > > >> > > ProFUSION embedded systems
> > > > > >> > > http://profusion.mobi
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> > > Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> > > Register now
> > > > > >> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> > > [email protected]
> > > > > >> > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> > Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> > Register now
> > > > > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> > [email protected]
> > > > > >> >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
> > > > --------------
> > > > > >> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > >> Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > >> Register now
> > > > > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > > > > Save $700 by Nov 18
> > > > > Register now
> > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
> > --------------
> > > > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to