This patch is rejected?? or could be in ?? :-) On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > Yop, > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Sebastian Dransfeld <s...@tango.flipp.net> > wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 09:41 AM, Bluezery wrote: >>> It's my mistake. >>> >>> fixed patch is attached again. >>> I have removed active flag also. >>> I use eina_list_data_find() instead. >> >> Also, there is used a lot of idlers. I think all idlers can be removed >> now, as we only do one multi perform on each fd handler ready. >> >> The reason the idlers were added, was that we did multi_perform in loop >> for 0.1s (or something like that) which clogged the system. >> >> Cedric was the one adding the idlers, Cedric??? > > Yup, the idler are here to reschedule the handling of data later so > that the UI continue to be responsive even in a storm of data on a > slow machine. I think they should be kept around as this will always > be the case. > -- > Cedric BAIL > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
