2011/11/19 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi>: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: >>> We should probably focus some efforts on rewriting/upgrading it, and then >>> bump >>> the .so version and do a 2.0 release for just e_dbus. >> >> better writing an ebus lib like raster told me, not using dbus but our own >> implementation. It seems (i'm not an expert, Gustavo told me that iirc) >> that using dbus means translating back and forth messages which is >> useless. Also, using eet would be better. > > I think you are talking about not using libdbus, right? Or you are > suffering the NIH syndrome trying to invent your own bus? >
>From what I recall, he discussed with k-s about the QT and Gtk guys having their own implementation of libdbus. No need to make hostile accusations. > > Lucas De Marchi > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
