On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:22:54 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Mike McCormack wrote: > > > On 11/29/2011 07:08 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> changelog ? > > > > Surely it's a bit redundant to write both a git/SVN commit message > > and update the ChangeLog? > > > > How about polishing the commit messages a bit, and using those for > > the ChangeLog at some point? > > As there is no way for now, and as the policy is to update the ChangeLog > when doing significant change, you have to update the ChangeLog. > > Anyway, about using commit message to update the ChangeLog, I actually use > for Evil a tool that does the contrary : I update the ChangeLog and it > commit with a commit message based on the last entry of the ChangeLog. But > it seems that nobody except me wants to use that tool. > > Vincent it was proven that there was a bug which prevented it working with git-svn, so nobody uses it ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
