On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:53:49 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> said:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.bz2 > > Copyright question for this. Unlike eet 1.2, this now installs a bunch > of example files by default. They don't include any license though. > Can they be adjusted to either put them explicitly into PD or reference > the normal license (inlined or as reference to the distributed COPYING). i don't see why it needs to. they come under the same license as the rest of eet unless explicitly stated otherwise - Eet.h has never put a copyright claim inside it as that has been made already at the time of distribution inside the tarball/tree and that was installed before too. same with the rest of the code. i know we don't install the COPYING but normal packaging practice is for it to be packaged inside the doc dirs for the distro package... and that's normally sufficient (as the package re-packages the distributed source as a rpm or deb and thus may lose the original licensing info if also not included for the user). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
