On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:10:42 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Tom. > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Last time we talked about it, we decided not to deprecate > > elm_entry_entry_get/set but leave them as clones. > > I didn't participate in that talk but why you decided not t deprecate them? > In my opinion, deprecating elm_entry_entry_get/set before elm 1.0 > sounds reasonable. > My 10 cents. > > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > > > > The rationale was the existence of entry_append and other text > > manipulation functions. > > > > entry_set/get were recently deprecated, was that intentional? what do > > you think, do we want to deprecate them or not? > > > > -- > > Tom. > > iirc we wanted it to be explicit with entry_set vs entry_append/prepend. also you're only allowed to put in 2 cents at a time unless you're raster. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
