hehe,
well, I just looked over edje_private.h and I didn't see any enum being
used like aspect_preference was.Although maybe it's best if someone else
had a quick look. I'm going to commit the patch I had as is.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:47:38 +0100 Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> said:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Youness Alaoui
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Cedric BAIL <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Youness Alaoui
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > I've had an issue recently when I tried to run my app (using edje)
> on the
> > >> > PS3, the aspect ratio of all the images were wrong, and it looked
> really
> > >> > bad. I investigated the issue and found out that the
> aspect_preference
> > >> was
> > >> > the cause and that when it's set to  'BOTH' for example, the
> > >> > desc->aspect.prefer value is 50331648 which is.. 0x3000000 .. so
> it's a
> > >> big
> > >> > endian vs. little endian issue since the EDJE_ASPECT_PREFER_BOTH
> value in
> > >> > the enum is '3'.
> > >> > So I figured the reading of the .edj is wrong, so I looked and it
> seems
> > >> to
> > >> > read it as a 'EET_T_CHAR', but the structure contains the enum as
> type,
> > >> > which makes it an int.. so what happens is that it stores 1 byte
> (the
> > >> char)
> > >> > in the 32bit variable.. on little endian, it's fine, it works, but
> on big
> > >> > endian, it makes the value huge. So I fixed it by changing the
> > >> declaration
> > >> > of he 'aspect.prefer' structure to a char instead of the enum it
> > >> > represents. I tested and it seems to work and not break anything
> (and
> > >> fixes
> > >> > the bug). However, since this seems a bit sensitive, I thought it's
> best
> > >> to
> > >> > send the patch here to make sure I'm not doing something wrong.
> > >> > Thanks for reviewing this simple one liner patch :
> > >> http://pastie.org/3176835
> > >> > I have noticed other structures do the same thing, 'fill mode' for
> > >> example
> > >> > is defined as EET_T_UCHAR in the eet data description and as
> 'unsigned
> > >> > char' in the structure, that's why I fixed it this way. Note also
> that
> > >> this
> > >> > shouldn't break the .edj file's compatibility or anything.
> > >>
> > >> Good, you figured out why it was broken. The fix sounds fine for me.
> > >> Did you check that the only enum, we are using directly in one of our
> > >> saved structure or should I check ?
> > >>
> > > Ok cool, I will commit it then. I checked and didn't see any other enum
> > > being used, but I didn't do an extensive check. I will make sure it
> was the
> > > only one and fix any other I might see.
> >
> > Cool, thanks !
>
> awesome. all handled before i got to it! eeeeeeeeeeeeeexcellent! :)
>
> --
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to