On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:57:30 +0100 Leif Middelschulte > <leif.middelschu...@gmail.com> said: > >> 2012/2/19 <cpmicha...@comcast.net>: >> > I suppose the xcb is left to me to fix when I run into this... >> Yeah, sorry Michael I have to push this onto you. I'm not familiar >> with the XCB bindings. It was necessary for stuff in e_randr. >> I hope it's not too much effort. > > now's a good time to learn. just read the xcb headers - if u know the xlib > functions you should figure out the xcb ones and then reading existing xcb > code > will show you how to use it. :) this is how i've learned most of what i know - > reading someone elses code. standing on the shoulders of giants.
also looking at the xlib code is sometimes necessary. In the case of extensions (xrandr, here), it's not necessary, though, as Xlib functions are a 1:1 map of the extension protocol, contrary to Xlib 'core' code. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
