On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:24:21 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:31:10 +0100 Leif Middelschulte
> > <leif.middelschu...@gmail.com> said:
> >
> > actually i'm worried about deprecating functions there in 1.0 or added
> > after.
> >
> > leif - dont deprecate the old function. we have to keep supporting it - add
> > new ones, but dont start deprecating functions that are now stable
> > supported api's of efl.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> Isn't it better to warn users since 1.x.y.z that a function is
> deprecated and there's a better option available? When we decide to
> bump API we can remove it and likely there will be no users of it
> anymore. Less pain to the transition 1 -> 2

no problems with deprecation in general - just that we are way too early to go
deprecating things - even if they stay supported for many years. it just adds
warnings to code very early in a support cycle.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to